↓ Skip to main content

Comparisons of proteomic profiles of whey protein between donor human milk collected earlier than 3 months and 6 months after delivery.

Overview of attention for article published in Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparisons of proteomic profiles of whey protein between donor human milk collected earlier than 3 months and 6 months after delivery.
Published in
Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, January 2018
DOI 10.6133/apjcn.032017.16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Won-Ho Hahn, Joon-Hwan Song, Jong-Bok Seo, Jung Eun Lee, Jeong-Sang Lee, Seunghyun Song, Joohyun Lee, Nam Mi Kang

Abstract

Human milk has nutritional, protective, and developmental advantages for premature infants. However, proteomic information of low abundant protein of donor milk is insufficient. The purpose of this study is to analyze and compare the proteome of low abundant protein of donor milk obtained at different postpartum ages other than the colostrum. Donor breast milk from 12 healthy mothers was collected 15 days, 2 months and 6 months after delivery and stored by medically approved methods. The whey milk proteomes were analyzed by mass spectrometry and classified using bioinformatics analysis. Human milk obtained 15 days and 2 months after delivery showed more abundant expression of whey proteins related to the generation of precursor metabolites and energy, metabolism, and catalytic activity, compared with milk collected at 3 months. Immune and transport-related proteins were abundant at all time points. Proteins involved in cellular movement, immune cell trafficking, and the carbohydrate metabolism network was more abundant in whey milk collected at 15 day and 2 months using a network analysis. We report proteomic information for human donor whey protein. As significant changes were found in whey proteome collected earlier than 2 months and 6 months after delivery, selecting human donor milk earlier than 2 months might be more helpful for early postnatal recipients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 17%
Unspecified 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 14 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 14%
Unspecified 3 8%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Chemistry 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 11 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#518
of 713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#343,505
of 449,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#35
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.