You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Stop Talking ‘Dirty’: Clinicians, Language, and Quality of Care for the Leading Cause of Preventable Death in the United States
|
---|---|
Published in |
American Journal of Medicine, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.07.043 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
John F Kelly, Sarah E Wakeman, Richard Saitz |
Abstract |
This Commentary is original and has not been published and is not under consideration elsewhere. All authors participated in the writing of the manuscript. Drs. John F. Kelly and Richard Saitz have received funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to conduct research on alcohol and other drug use disorders, and to speak at universities and government events. Dr. Saitz has also testified as an expert witness for alcohol cases, and provided consultation to Uptodate and the British Medical Journal. Dr. Sarah E. Wakeman, has no conflicts of interest to report. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 32 | 41% |
Canada | 9 | 11% |
Australia | 9 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
India | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 22 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 53 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 19% |
Scientists | 9 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 118 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
Other | 30 | 25% |
Unknown | 28 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 23% |
Social Sciences | 18 | 15% |
Psychology | 18 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 9% |
Unknown | 30 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#403,019
of 25,649,244 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Medicine
#192
of 7,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,624
of 249,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Medicine
#4
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,649,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.