| Title |
Quality comparison of tap water vs. bottled water in the industrial city of Yanbu (Saudi Arabia)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, November 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10661-008-0608-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maqbool Ahmad, Ahmad S. Bajahlan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 279 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 78 | 28% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Oman | 1 | <1% |
| Kuwait | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Estonia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 196 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 269 | 96% |
| Scientists | 6 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Fiji | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 15% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 29 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 20 | 18% |
| Engineering | 16 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 36 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 237. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2023.
All research outputs
#162,899
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#3
of 3,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301
of 100,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,101 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.