↓ Skip to main content

Athletes Rated as Poor Single-Leg Squat Performers Display Measurable Differences in Single-Leg Squat Biomechanics Compared With Good Performers.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Athletes Rated as Poor Single-Leg Squat Performers Display Measurable Differences in Single-Leg Squat Biomechanics Compared With Good Performers.
Published in
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, October 2018
DOI 10.1123/jsr.2016-0208
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lachlan E Garrick, Bryce C Alexander, Anthony G Schache, Marcus G Pandy, Kay M Crossley, Natalie J Collins

Abstract

It is important to validate single-leg squat visual rating criteria used in clinical practice and research. Foot orthoses may improve single-leg squat performance in those who demonstrate biomechanics associated with increased risk of lower-limb injury. Validate visual rating criteria proposed by Crossley et al, by determining whether athletes rated as poor single-leg squat performers display different single-leg squat biomechanics than good performers; and evaluate immediate effects of foot orthoses on single-leg squat biomechanics in poor performers. Comparative cross-sectional study. University laboratory. 79 asymptomatic athletes underwent video classification of single-leg squat performance based on established visual rating criteria (overall impression, trunk posture, pelvis 'in space', hip movement, knee movement), and were rated as good (n=23), fair (n=41) or poor (n=15) performers. A subset of good (n=16) and poor (n=12) performers underwent biomechanical assessment, completing five continuous single-leg squats on their dominant limb while three-dimensional motion analysis and ground reaction force data were recorded. Poor performers repeated the task standing on prefabricated foot orthoses. Peak external knee adduction moment (KAM) and peak angles for the trunk, hip, knee and ankle. Compared to good performers, poor performers had a significantly lower peak KAM (mean difference 0.11 Nm/kg, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02 to 0.2 Nm/kg), higher peak hip adduction angle (-4.3°, -7.6° to -0.9°), and higher peak trunk axial rotation towards their stance limb (3.8°, 0.4° to 7.2°). Foot orthoses significantly increased the peak KAM in poor performers (-0.06 Nm/kg, -0.1 to -0.01 Nm/kg), with values approximating those observed in good performers. Findings validate Crossley et al's visual rating criteria for single-leg squat performance in asymptomatic athletes, and suggest that 'off-the-shelf' foot orthoses may be a simple intervention for poor performers to normalize the magnitude of the external KAM during single-leg squat.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Master 8 10%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 23 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 19%
Sports and Recreations 15 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 12%
Engineering 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 27 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2018.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
#981
of 1,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#313,602
of 358,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
#22
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.