You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Heterogeneous responses of temperate-zone amphibian populations to climate change complicates conservation planning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-017-17105-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E. Muths, T. Chambert, B. R. Schmidt, D. A. W. Miller, B. R. Hossack, P. Joly, O. Grolet, D. M. Green, D. S. Pilliod, M. Cheylan, R. N. Fisher, R. M. McCaffery, M. J. Adams, W. J. Palen, J. W. Arntzen, J. Garwood, G. Fellers, J.-M. Thirion, A. Besnard, E. H. Campbell Grant |
| Abstract |
The pervasive and unabated nature of global amphibian declines suggests common demographic responses to a given driver, and quantification of major drivers and responses could inform broad-scale conservation actions. We explored the influence of climate on demographic parameters (i.e., changes in the probabilities of survival and recruitment) using 31 datasets from temperate zone amphibian populations (North America and Europe) with more than a decade of observations each. There was evidence for an influence of climate on population demographic rates, but the direction and magnitude of responses to climate drivers was highly variable among taxa and among populations within taxa. These results reveal that climate drivers interact with variation in life-history traits and population-specific attributes resulting in a diversity of responses. This heterogeneity complicates the identification of conservation 'rules of thumb' for these taxa, and supports the notion of local focus as the most effective approach to overcome global-scale conservation challenges. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 19% |
| Researcher | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 32 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,086,689
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#65,109
of 124,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,779
of 439,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2,088
of 4,306 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,306 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.