| Title |
Neither Adaptive Thinking nor Reverse Engineering: methods in the evolutionary social sciences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology & Philosophy, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10539-014-9466-7 |
| Authors |
Catherine Driscoll |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 31% |
| Researcher | 5 | 31% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 5 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2015.
All research outputs
#15,313,289
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#504
of 663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,557
of 260,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them