Title |
3d Abelian dualities with boundaries
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of High Energy Physics, March 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/jhep03(2018)053 |
Authors |
Kyle Aitken, Andrew Baumgartner, Andreas Karch, Brandon Robinson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 31% |
Researcher | 4 | 31% |
Professor | 2 | 15% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 12 | 92% |
Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of High Energy Physics
#8,753
of 24,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,543
of 348,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of High Energy Physics
#272
of 521 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,152 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 521 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.