You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Financial incentives for physicians to improve health care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.171126 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M Ruth Lavergne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 18 | 33% |
| United States | 7 | 13% |
| Australia | 3 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Iraq | 1 | 2% |
| Djibouti | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 56% |
| Scientists | 15 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2024.
All research outputs
#549,423
of 25,193,883 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#913
of 9,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,540
of 452,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#23
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,193,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.