↓ Skip to main content

Post-traumatic knee MRI findings and associations with patient, trauma, and clinical characteristics: a subgroup analysis in primary care in the Netherlands

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Post-traumatic knee MRI findings and associations with patient, trauma, and clinical characteristics: a subgroup analysis in primary care in the Netherlands
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, November 2017
DOI 10.3399/bjgp17x693653
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kim van Oudenaarde, Nynke M Swart, Johan L Bloem, Sita Ma Bierma-Zeinstra, Paul R Algra, Bart Koes, Jan Verhaar, Rob Ghh Nelissen, Patrick Je Bindels, Pim Aj Luijsterburg, Monique Reijnierse

Abstract

The added value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in primary care is still being debated. A high diagnostic yield can be expected in young and active patients with post-traumatic knee complaints. To determine the frequency of MRI abnormalities in young and active patients (aged 18-45 years) and the associations with patient, trauma, and clinical characteristics. A subgroup analysis of 174 patients, aged 18-45 years with knee trauma of <6 months, allocated to MRI in a randomised controlled trial on the yield of MRI in primary care. Patients were recruited by 150 GPs in the Netherlands from October 2012 to November 2015. Associations were expressed using mean differences, odds ratio (OR) and predictive values. Sixty-seven out of 174 patients (39%) had a positive MRI finding, predominantly anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures (22%) and/or traumatic meniscal tears (15%). Patients with a pre-existing musculoskeletal comorbidity had a two-fold lower prevalence of positive MRI findings (21%), OR 3.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3 to 7.0). A 'sports related trauma' showed the highest OR of 4.6 (95% CI = 2.2 to 9.3) for a positive MRI finding. Clinical scores were statistically, significantly worse in patients with positive MRI findings, with mean differences ranging from 10 to 20%. Furthermore, increasing duration of complaints was correlated with decreasing prevalence rates of positive MRI findings. Overall, a popping sound and direct swelling showed the highest positive predictive value of 65% for the presence of positive MRI findings. The results from this study enable a preselection of patients to increase the diagnostic yield of MRI in primary care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 12%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 28 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 14%
Sports and Recreations 4 6%
Unspecified 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 33 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,454,971
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#4,146
of 4,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#372,456
of 437,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#83
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.