↓ Skip to main content

Moral theory and defective tobacco advertising and warnings (the business ethics of Cipollone v. Liggett Group)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, November 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Moral theory and defective tobacco advertising and warnings (the business ethics of Cipollone v. Liggett Group)
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, November 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf00384524
Authors

John F. Quinn

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 4 36%
Social Sciences 3 27%
Computer Science 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,542,364
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#1,192
of 2,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,262
of 15,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them