↓ Skip to main content

Big data in social and psychological science: theoretical and methodological issues

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Computational Social Science, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Big data in social and psychological science: theoretical and methodological issues
Published in
Journal of Computational Social Science, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s42001-017-0013-6
Authors

Lin Qiu, Sarah Hian May Chan, David Chan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 24 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 33%
Social Sciences 13 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 5%
Computer Science 5 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 29 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,127,018
of 25,396,120 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computational Social Science
#59
of 138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,157
of 445,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computational Social Science
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,396,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.