Title |
Adaptations to Aerobic and Resistance Exercise in the Elderly
|
---|---|
Published in |
Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, May 2005
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11154-005-6726-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Charles P. Lambert, William J. Evans |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 91 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 22% |
Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
Researcher | 9 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
Other | 14 | 15% |
Unknown | 19 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 24 | 26% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 14% |
Unknown | 22 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2015.
All research outputs
#2,027,804
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
#76
of 505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,087
of 59,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them