You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Whole-Genome Sequencing Confirms that Burkholderia pseudomallei Multilocus Sequence Types Common to Both Cambodia and Australia Are Due to Homoplasy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1128/jcm.02574-14 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Birgit De Smet, Derek S. Sarovich, Erin P. Price, Mark Mayo, Vanessa Theobald, Chun Kham, Seiha Heng, Phe Thong, Matthew T. G. Holden, Julian Parkhill, Sharon J. Peacock, Brian G. Spratt, Jan A. Jacobs, Peter Vandamme, Bart J. Currie |
Abstract |
Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates with shared multilocus sequence types (STs) have not been isolated from different continents. We identified two STs shared between Australia and Cambodia. Whole-genome analysis revealed substantial diversity within STs, correctly identified the Asian or Australian origin, and confirmed that these shared STs were due to homoplasy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | 4% |
Thailand | 1 | 4% |
Belgium | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 23 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 19% |
Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
Researcher | 4 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 6 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 35% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 23% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Decision Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2015.
All research outputs
#17,283,763
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
#12,613
of 14,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,421
of 271,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
#69
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.