↓ Skip to main content

The motor theory of speech perception reviewed

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
489 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
701 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
The motor theory of speech perception reviewed
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, June 2006
DOI 10.3758/bf03193857
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruno Galantucci, Carol A. Fowler, M. T. Turvey

Abstract

More than 50 years after the appearance of the motor theory of speech perception, it is timely to evaluate its three main claims that (1) speech processing is special, (2) perceiving speech is perceiving gestures, and (3) the motor system is recruited for perceiving speech. We argue that to the extent that it can be evaluated, the first claim is likely false. As for the second claim, we review findings that support it and argue that although each of these findings may be explained by alternative accounts, the claim provides a single coherent account. As for the third claim, we review findings in the literature that support it at different levels of generality and argue that the claim anticipated a theme that has become widespread in cognitive science.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 701 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 23 3%
United Kingdom 12 2%
Canada 6 <1%
Netherlands 5 <1%
France 4 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Other 12 2%
Unknown 628 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 211 30%
Researcher 114 16%
Student > Master 92 13%
Student > Bachelor 52 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 42 6%
Other 132 19%
Unknown 58 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 220 31%
Linguistics 169 24%
Neuroscience 62 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 4%
Computer Science 26 4%
Other 103 15%
Unknown 91 13%