↓ Skip to main content

Amino acids on the rampant primordial Earth: Electric discharges and the hot salty ocean

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Diversity, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 463)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Amino acids on the rampant primordial Earth: Electric discharges and the hot salty ocean
Published in
Molecular Diversity, February 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11030-006-7009-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristof Plankensteiner, Hannes Reiner, Bernd M. Rode

Abstract

For more than 50 years scientists who study prebiotic chemistry have been dealing with chemical evolution as it could have possibly taken place on the primordial Earth. Since we will never know what processes have really taken place around 3.8 to 4 billion years ago we can only come up with plausible reaction pathways that work well in an early Earth scenario as indicated by geochemists. In our work we have investigated the plausibility of one particularly important branch of prebiotic chemistry, the formation of amino acids, by electric discharge in a neutral atmosphere composed of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and water vapour above liquid water. We have found yields of various amino acids under different temperature conditions, with and without sodium chloride in a simulated primordial lake or ocean within extremely short reaction times compared to the timespan available for prebiotic evolution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Student > Master 7 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 15 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,913,614
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Diversity
#3
of 463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,891
of 154,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Diversity
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 463 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them