| Title |
Polymerase chain reaction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Immunology, November 1989
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00918012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Henry A. Erlich |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 403 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 398 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 135 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 68 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 5% |
| Unknown | 120 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 99 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 83 | 21% |
| Chemistry | 20 | 5% |
| Engineering | 14 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 51 | 13% |
| Unknown | 124 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,820,108
of 24,169,085 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Immunology
#197
of 1,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#861
of 15,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Immunology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,169,085 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them