↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Reconstruction and Reoperation on Long-Term Patient-Reported Satisfaction After Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Impact of Reconstruction and Reoperation on Long-Term Patient-Reported Satisfaction After Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, September 2014
DOI 10.1245/s10434-014-4053-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judy C. Boughey, Tanya L. Hoskin, Lynn C. Hartmann, Joanne L. Johnson, Steven R. Jacobson, Amy C. Degnim, Marlene H. Frost

Abstract

Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) is increasingly chosen by breast cancer patients and may be related to increased use of immediate reconstruction. This study examines long-term patient satisfaction with CPM and reconstruction in a historical cohort.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 12%
Psychology 6 10%
Unspecified 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2014.
All research outputs
#775,085
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#72
of 6,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,595
of 238,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.