↓ Skip to main content

Reconsidering Ocean Calamities

Overview of attention for article published in BioScience, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
294 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reconsidering Ocean Calamities
Published in
BioScience, December 2014
DOI 10.1093/biosci/biu198
Authors

Carlos M. Duarte, Robinson W. Fulweiler, Catherine E. Lovelock, Paulina Martinetto, Megan I. Saunders, John M. Pandolfi, Stefan Gelcich, Scott W. Nixon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 4%
Spain 3 1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Tunisia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 266 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 23%
Researcher 65 22%
Student > Master 46 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Other 16 5%
Other 45 15%
Unknown 36 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 119 40%
Environmental Science 64 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 33 11%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 1%
Other 16 5%
Unknown 51 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2018.
All research outputs
#371,558
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#149
of 3,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,404
of 365,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.