↓ Skip to main content

Continuing medical education revisited: theoretical assumptions and practical implications: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Continuing medical education revisited: theoretical assumptions and practical implications: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Medical Education, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12909-014-0278-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Dionyssopoulos, Thanassis Karalis, Eugenia A Panitsides

Abstract

BackgroundRecent research has evidenced that although investment in Continuing Medical Education (CME), both in terms of participation as well as financial resources allocated to it, has been steadily increasing to catch up with accelerating advances in health information and technology, effectiveness of CME is reported to be rather limited. Poor and disproportional returns can be attributed to failure of CME courses to address and stimulate an adult audience.MethodsThe present study initially drew on research findings and adult learning theories, providing the basis for comprehending adult learning, while entailing practical implications on fostering effectiveness in the design and delivery of CME. On a second level, a qualitative study was conducted with the aim to elucidate parameters accounting for effectiveness in educational interventions. Qualitative data was retrieved through 12 in-depth interviews, conducted with a random sample of participants in the 26th European Workshop of Advanced Plastic Surgery (EWAPS). The data underwent a three level qualitative analysis, following the ¿grounded theory¿ methodology, comprising `open coding¿, `axial coding¿ and `selective coding¿.ResultsFindings from the EWAPS study come in line with relevant literature, entailing significant implications for the necessity to apply a more effective and efficient paradigm in the design and delivery of educational interventions, advocating for implementing learner-centered schemata in CME and benefiting from a model that draws on the learning environment and social aspects of learning.ConclusionsWhat emerged as a pivotal parameter in designing educational interventions is to focus on small group educational events which could provide a supportive friendly context, enhance motivation through learner-centered approaches and allow interaction, experimentation and critical reflection. It should be outlined however that further research is required as the present study is limited in scope, having dealt with a limited sample.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 14%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Professor 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 18 28%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 33%
Social Sciences 10 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 15 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2015.
All research outputs
#12,908,579
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,523
of 3,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,928
of 352,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#27
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.