↓ Skip to main content

Relationship between self-reported cognitive function and work-related outcomes in breast cancer survivors

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Survivorship, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Relationship between self-reported cognitive function and work-related outcomes in breast cancer survivors
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11764-017-0664-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diane Von Ah, Susan Storey, Adele Crouch

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between perceived cognitive function including perceived cognitive impairment (PCI) and perceived cognitive ability (PCA) and work ability, work performance, work productivity, and intention to leave employment in breast cancer survivors (BCS). A cross-sectional study design was used in the study. Employed BCS completed questionnaires assessing PCI and PCA (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive-3); emotional work demands (Self-Focused Emotional Labor Scale); and work ability index (WAI), work performance, work productivity (Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ), and intention to turnover. Separate regression models examined the relationship between PCI and PCA and work-related outcomes. Participants were 68 employed female BCS who were on average 52 (SD = 8.6) years old and 5 (SD = 3.8) years post-treatment with majority working full time. PCI was associated with poorer work ability (B = - 0.658), work performance (time-B = 0.647, physical-B = - 0.414, and mental-B = 0.689), and work productivity (B = 0.731), but not intent to leave work. PCA was related to higher levels of work ability (B = 0.472), work performance (time-B = - 0.462 and mental-B = - 0.453), and work productivity (β = - 0.494), but not physical demands or intent to turnover. Employed BCS with negative perceptions of cognitive function reported poorer work outcomes with the exception of the intent to leave employment. In contrast, positive views of one's cognitive abilities were related to improved ratings of work outcomes again with the exception of intent to leave employment. Healthcare providers need to assess and address perceived cognitive functioning to promote work-related outcomes in BCS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Master 12 12%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 5 5%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 38 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 11%
Psychology 9 9%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Unspecified 4 4%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 48 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#18,578,649
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#861
of 986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327,466
of 439,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.