↓ Skip to main content

Impacts of Land Use/Land Cover Change on Climate and Future Research Priorities

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
223 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
447 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impacts of Land Use/Land Cover Change on Climate and Future Research Priorities
Published in
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, January 2010
DOI 10.1175/2009bams2769.1
Authors

Rezaul Mahmood, Arturo I. Quintanar, Glen Conner, Ronnie Leeper, Scott Dobler, Roger A. Pielke, Adriana Beltran-Przekurat, Kenneth G. Hubbard, Dev Niyogi, Gordon Bonan, Peter Lawrence, Thomas Chase, Richard McNider, Yuling Wu, Clive McAlpine, Ravinesh Deo, Andres Etter, Samuel Gameda, Budong Qian, Andrew Carleton, Jimmy O. Adegoke, Sajith Vezhapparambu, Salvi Asefi, Udaysankar S. Nair, Elif Sertel, David R. Legates, Robert Hale, Oliver W. Frauenfeld, Anthony Watts, Marshall Shepherd, Chandana Mitra, Valentine G. Anantharaj, Souleymane Fall, Hsin-I. Chang, Robert Lund, Anna Treviño, Peter Blanken, Jinyang Du, Jozef Syktus

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 447 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Colombia 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 425 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 108 24%
Student > Master 64 14%
Researcher 60 13%
Student > Bachelor 34 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 6%
Other 75 17%
Unknown 77 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 122 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 107 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 9%
Engineering 39 9%
Computer Science 13 3%
Other 40 9%
Unknown 85 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,965,349
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
#610
of 3,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,753
of 177,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.