↓ Skip to main content

Integrating continuous stocks and flows into state‐and‐transition simulation models of landscape change

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrating continuous stocks and flows into state‐and‐transition simulation models of landscape change
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, January 2018
DOI 10.1111/2041-210x.12952
Authors

Colin J. Daniel, Benjamin M. Sleeter, Leonardo Frid, Marie‐Josée Fortin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Other 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Master 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 15 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 24%
Mathematics 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 14 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2019.
All research outputs
#4,281,274
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#1,697
of 2,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,086
of 450,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#43
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.