↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Prognostic significance of tumor burden assessed by whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in multiple myeloma patients treated with allogeneic stem cell transplantation
Published in
Haematologica, December 2017
DOI 10.3324/haematol.2017.176073
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a disputed but increasing therapeutic option in patients suffering from multiple myeloma in Europe. To study possible predictors of survival, 79 patients were investigated using whole-body magnetic resonance imaging to assess the visible tumor burden before and after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Statistical analysis of clinical and imaging parameters included Cox regression models and distribution of survival time estimates (Kaplan-Meier method). Log rank test was used to determine the prognostic impact of the presence of focal lesions on survival. A higher tumor burden according to the lesion count was associated with a shorter overall survival (univariable/multivariable Cox regression: 1st magnetic resonance imaging p=0.028/ p=0.048; 2nd magnetic resonance imaging p=0.008/ p=0.024). Focal infiltration pattern itself seemed to be an additional adverse prognostic factor for overall survival (2nd MRI p=0.048), although no definite cut-off could be defined. Kaplan-Meier estimates at 60 months of follow-up show a significant difference (Log rank p=0.04) for overall survival rates between patients with focal infiltration (32%) and those without (75%). Since this subgroup of patients may benefit from maintenance therapy, adoptive immunotherapy, or local interventions, whole-body imaging is an appropriate and highly recommendable diagnostic approach for detection of prognostically relevant lesions before and after treatment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 11 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 33%
Engineering 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#22,698,249
of 27,788,586 outputs
Outputs from Haematologica
#4,259
of 4,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#349,569
of 454,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Haematologica
#68
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,788,586 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.