↓ Skip to main content

Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Daling River Adjacent to Fluorine Industrial Parks: Implication from Industrial Emission

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Daling River Adjacent to Fluorine Industrial Parks: Implication from Industrial Emission
Published in
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00128-014-1419-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Meng, Tieyu Wang, Pei Wang, Zhaoyun Zhu, Qifeng Li, Yonglong Lu

Abstract

The pollution level and source of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in mainstream and tributary of Daling River in northeast China were investigated in present study. Concentrations of PFASs in surface water and sediment ranged from 4.6 to 3,410 ng/L and from 0.08 to 2.6 ng/g dry weight, respectively. The lowest levels of PFASs were found in vicinity of a drinking water source located in upstream of Daling River. Xihe tributary, which is adjacent to two local fluorine industrial parks, contained the highest level of PFASs. Short-chain PFASs, including perfluorobutanoic acid and perfluorobutane sulfonate, were of higher levels due to their emerging as alternative products for perfluorooctane sulfonate. High level of perfluorooctanoic acid was also found in Daling River. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the relatively severe pollutions of Xihe tributary were caused by long-term development of the two local fluorine industry parks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 25%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 9 32%
Chemistry 2 7%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 11 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2015.
All research outputs
#17,579,816
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#2,751
of 4,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,840
of 371,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#7
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,250 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.