↓ Skip to main content

Differential Treatment Mechanisms in Mindfulness Meditation and Progressive Muscle Relaxation

Overview of attention for article published in Mindfulness, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Differential Treatment Mechanisms in Mindfulness Meditation and Progressive Muscle Relaxation
Published in
Mindfulness, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12671-017-0869-9
Authors

Liya Gao, Joshua Curtiss, Xinghua Liu, Stefan G. Hofmann

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 17%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Other 7 6%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 24 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 30 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2018.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Mindfulness
#1,394
of 1,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#383,469
of 443,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mindfulness
#27
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.