| Title |
Geodetic methods to determine the relativistic redshift at the level of 10-18 in the context of international timescales: a review and practical results
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Geodesy, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00190-017-1075-1 |
| Authors |
Heiner Denker, Ludger Timmen, Christian Voigt, Stefan Weyers, Ekkehard Peik, Helen S. Margolis, Pacôme Delva, Peter Wolf, Gérard Petit |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 26% |
| Researcher | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 17 | 40% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2017.
All research outputs
#18,578,649
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geodesy
#243
of 282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327,055
of 439,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geodesy
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.