↓ Skip to main content

Computational Peptidology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 9: In Silico Design of Antimicrobial Peptides.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
In Silico Design of Antimicrobial Peptides.
Chapter number 9
Book title
Computational Peptidology
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2285-7_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-2284-0, 978-1-4939-2285-7
Authors

Giuseppe Maccari, Mariagrazia Di Luca, Riccardo Nifosì

Editors

Peng Zhou, Jian Huang

Abstract

The rapid spread of drug-resistant pathogenic microbial strains has created an urgent need for the development of new anti-infective molecules, having different mechanism of action in comparison to existing drugs. Natural antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) represent a novel class of molecules with a broad spectrum of activity and a low rate in inducing bacterial resistance. In particular, linear alpha-helical cationic antimicrobial peptides are among the most widespread membrane-disruptive AMPs in nature, representing a particularly successful structural arrangement of the innate defense against microbes. However, until now, many AMPs have failed in clinical trials because of several drawbacks that strongly limit their applicability such as degradation, cytotoxicity, and high production cost. Thus, to overcome the limitations of native peptides, a rational in silico approach to AMPs design becomes a promising strategy that drastically reduce production costs and the time required for evaluation of activity and toxicity.This chapter focuses on the strategies and methods for de novo design of potentially active AMPs. In particular, statistical-based design strategies and MD methods for modelling AMPs are elucidated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 47 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 8%
Chemistry 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,248,338
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,866
of 13,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,450
of 361,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#628
of 996 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,092 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 996 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.