| Title |
Adipose tissue derived stem cells: in vitro and in vivo analysis of a standard and three commercially available cell-assisted lipotransfer techniques
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/scrt536 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rossana Domenis, Lara Lazzaro, Sarah Calabrese, Damiano Mangoni, Annarita Gallelli, Evgenia Bourkoula, Ivana Manini, Natascha Bergamin, Barbara Toffoletto, Carlo A Beltrami, Antonio P Beltrami, Daniela Cesselli, Pier Camillo Parodi |
| Abstract |
Autologous fat grafting is commonly used to correct soft-tissue contour deformities. However, results are impaired by a variable and unpredictable resorption rate. Autologous adipose-derived stromal cells in combination with lipoinjection (cell-assisted lipotransfer) seem to favor a long-term persistence of fat grafts, thus fostering the development of devices to be used in the operating room at the point of care, to isolate the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and produce SVF-enhanced fat grafts with safe and standardized protocols. Focusing on patients undergoing breast reconstruction by lipostructure, we analyzed a standard technique, a modification of the Coleman's procedure, and three different commercially available devices (Lipokit, Cytori, Fastem), in terms of 1) ability to enrich fat grafts in stem cells and 2) clinical outcome at 6 and 12 months. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 143 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 14% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 20% |
| Unknown | 35 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 6% |
| Energy | 2 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 42 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,634,042
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#85
of 2,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,243
of 352,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.