↓ Skip to main content

Active Breathing Coordinator reduces radiation dose to the heart and preserves local control in patients with left breast cancer: Report of a prospective trial

Overview of attention for article published in Practical Radiation Oncology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 1,028)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
9 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Active Breathing Coordinator reduces radiation dose to the heart and preserves local control in patients with left breast cancer: Report of a prospective trial
Published in
Practical Radiation Oncology, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.prro.2014.06.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harriet Eldredge-Hindy, Virginia Lockamy, Albert Crawford, Virginia Nettleton, Maria Werner-Wasik, Joshua Siglin, Nicole L. Simone, Kulbir Sidhu, Pramila R. Anne

Abstract

Incidental radiation dose to the heart and lung during breast radiation therapy (RT) has been associated with an increased risk of cardiopulmonary morbidity. We conducted a prospective trial to determine if RT with the Active Breathing Coordinator (ABC) can reduce the mean heart dose (MHD) by ≥20% and dose to the lung.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Slovenia 1 2%
Unknown 63 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Master 9 14%
Other 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 22%
Physics and Astronomy 4 6%
Engineering 3 5%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2018.
All research outputs
#703,537
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Practical Radiation Oncology
#34
of 1,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,829
of 359,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Practical Radiation Oncology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them