| Title |
Reform der Primärversorgung in Österreich
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10354-017-0613-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Herbert Johann Bachler, Raphael Bertsch |
| Abstract |
Within the Austrian health care reform, a new policy is generally proposed to strengthen primary care (PC). The aim of this study was to illustrate the status quo in the Tyrolean PC system and to provide the opportunity to examine the reform feasibility. Therefore, a prospective cross-sectional study was performed among licensed GPs in Tyrol, using an online questionnaire. The results of the survey among 87 GPs show that only 20% of Tyrolean PC settings already fulfill the coreteam availabilty described in the reformplans. However, there are differences between urban and rural areas. The highest dissatisfaction was detected in the fields of administration, financing and appreciation of PC. Primarily there is a request by the GPs for implementation of group practices. Only few concerns about the proposed PC centers were noticed. It seems necessary to improve availability, especially outside the core times and during the night. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 2 | 67% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2017.
All research outputs
#13,718,294
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
#197
of 436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,729
of 444,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 436 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.