↓ Skip to main content

Identification of clustered phosphorylation sites in PKD2L1: how PKD2L1 channel activation is regulated by cyclic adenosine monophosphate signaling pathway

Overview of attention for article published in Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Identification of clustered phosphorylation sites in PKD2L1: how PKD2L1 channel activation is regulated by cyclic adenosine monophosphate signaling pathway
Published in
Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00424-017-2095-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eunice Yon June Park, Misun Kwak, Kotdaji Ha, Insuk So

Abstract

Polycystic kidney disease 2-like-1 (PKD2L1), or polycystin-L or TRPP2, formerly TRPP3, is a transient receptor potential (TRP) superfamily member. It is a calcium-permeable non-selective cation channel that regulates intracellular calcium concentration and thereby calcium signaling. PKD2L1 has been reported to take part in hedgehog signaling in renal primary cilia and sour tasting coupling with PKD1L3. In addition to the previous reports, PKD2L1 is recently found to play a crucial role in localization with β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) on the neuronal primary cilia. The disruption of PKD2L1 leads to the loss of β2AR on the primary cilia and reduction in intracellular concentration of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). Since the role of cAMP and PKA is frequently mentioned in the studies of PKD diseases, we investigated on the mechanism of cAMP regulation in relation to the function of PKD2L1 channel. In this study, we observed the activity of PKD2L1 channel increased by the downstream cascades of β2AR and found the clustered phosphorylation sites, Ser-682, Ser-685, and Ser-686 that are significant in the channel regulation by phosphorylation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Unknown 6 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Unknown 7 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2017.
All research outputs
#21,164,509
of 23,818,521 outputs
Outputs from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#1,798
of 1,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#379,522
of 443,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#13
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,818,521 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,973 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.