| Title |
How many species of Cyanobacteria are there? Using a discovery curve to predict the species number
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-013-0561-x |
| Authors |
João Carlos Nabout, Barbbara da Silva Rocha, Fernanda Melo Carneiro, Célia Leite Sant’Anna |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 67% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 6 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 203 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 18% |
| Researcher | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Unknown | 41 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 72 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 29 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 4% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 52 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,192,786
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#315
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,201
of 211,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.