↓ Skip to main content

MicroRNA in exosomes isolated directly from the liver circulation in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MicroRNA in exosomes isolated directly from the liver circulation in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma
Published in
BMC Cancer, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-14-962
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Eldh, Roger Olofsson Bagge, Cecilia Lässer, Joar Svanvik, Margareta Sjöstrand, Jan Mattsson, Per Lindnér, Dong-Sic Choi, Yong Song Gho, Jan Lötvall

Abstract

Uveal melanoma is a tumour arising from melanocytes of the eye, and 30 per cent of these patients develop liver metastases. Exosomes are small RNA containing nano-vesicles released by most cells, including malignant melanoma cells. This clinical translational study included patients undergoing isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) for metastatic uveal melanoma, from whom exosomes were isolated directly from liver perfusates. The objective was to determine whether exosomes are present in the liver circulation, and to ascertain whether these may originate from melanoma cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 2%
Turkey 1 <1%
Unknown 112 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 21%
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 9%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 16%
Chemistry 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 24 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2015.
All research outputs
#17,736,409
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,959
of 8,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,694
of 354,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#97
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,286 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.