| Title |
Concordance with World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) guidelines for cancer prevention and obesity-related cancer risk in the Framingham Offspring cohort (1991–2008)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Causes & Control, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10552-014-0509-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nour Makarem, Yong Lin, Elisa V. Bandera, Paul F. Jacques, Niyati Parekh |
| Abstract |
This prospective cohort study evaluates associations between healthful behaviors consistent with WCRF/AICR cancer prevention guidelines and obesity-related cancer risk, as a third of cancers are estimated to be preventable. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 6 | 18% |
| Canada | 4 | 12% |
| United States | 4 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Iraq | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 24% |
| Scientists | 4 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 159 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 13% |
| Researcher | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Unknown | 40 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 6% |
| Psychology | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 47 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 118. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2016.
All research outputs
#321,879
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#22
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,041
of 358,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.