↓ Skip to main content

Measuring Fear of Physical Activity in Patients with Heart Failure

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Measuring Fear of Physical Activity in Patients with Heart Failure
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12529-017-9704-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremia M. Hoffmann, Susan Hellwig, Vincent M. Brandenburg, Heike Spaderna

Abstract

Fear of physical activity (FoPA) has been suggested as a psychological barrier to exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation and everyday physical activity (PA) in patients with heart failure (HF). We evaluated the recently developed Fear of Activity in Situations-Heart Failure (FActS-HF) questionnaire that assesses affective/cognitive fear reactions to situations of varying PA intensities. The FActS-HF was given to 132 ambulatory patients with stable HF (67 ± 12 years, 80% men). In 121 participants with valid FActS-HF data, the questionnaire's dimensionality was investigated. Psychometric properties were determined in terms of reliability and validity. We assessed convergent and discriminant correlations of FoPA with anxiety, kinesiophobia, and depression. External validation criteria encompassed clinical variables and objectively assessed accelerometer measures of everyday PA in a subsample of 61 participants. The FActS-HF measures a unidimensional construct (i.e., FoPA) based on items presenting varying PA intensities (i.e., the more intense the PA, the stronger the fear response). The scale demonstrated good 2-week stability (r tt = 0.82) and excellent internal consistency reliability (α = 0.97). FoPA was moderately to strongly associated with anxiety and kinesiophobia, and weakly to moderately associated with state/trait depression, supporting convergent and discriminant validity, respectively. High FoPA was associated with feeling uninformed about HF, comorbidities, non participitation to cardio fitness groups, and less stair climbing, as measured by accelerometry. The FActS-HF is a reliable and valid instrument to measure FoPA in patients with HF and provides a promising tool for further research and practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Master 10 10%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 35 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 29 29%
Sports and Recreations 9 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Psychology 9 9%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 34 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2018.
All research outputs
#14,369,953
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#563
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,900
of 439,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.