↓ Skip to main content

Akupunktur als Leistung der gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung in Deutschland

Overview of attention for article published in Der Schmerz, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Akupunktur als Leistung der gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung in Deutschland
Published in
Der Schmerz, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00482-017-0258-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Hickstein, S. Kiel, C. Raus, S. Heß, J. Walker, J.-F. Chenot

Abstract

The coverage for acupuncture for chronic lower back or knee pain by the statutory health insurance was introduced in 2007. The aim of this study was to investigate characteristics of patients and providers of acupuncture and temporal and regional trends in the utilization of acupuncture. This retrospective observational study used anonymized statutory health insurance claims data from a sample of roughly four million subjects. The sample is representative of the German population regarding age and gender in 2013. Lower back pain was the most common coded indication (86%) for billing acupuncture. Women were more often treated with acupuncture than men; the mean age was 61.1 years. For 63% acupuncture was billed in 2014 for the first time, 37% already had an acupuncture treatment in 2012 or 2013. Premature termination (<6 sessions) was observed in 14% of all insurants receiving acupuncture for the first time in 2014 for knee pain and in 21% of those with back pain. Overall there was a statistically significant decrease in the utilization of acupuncture from 2008 to 2015. Regional differences between East and West Germany and city states were observed. Half of all acupuncture treatments in 2014 were provided by 11% of all physicians who billed acupuncture at least once. Higher utilization of acupuncture by women reflects the epidemiology of back and knee pain and their preference for alternative complementary medicine. On the one hand, the large proportion of patients treated repeatedly with acupuncture suggests perceived benefits. On the other hand, provision of acupuncture services is decreasing continuously and a relevant proportion of subjects are terminating treatment prematurely.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,454,971
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from Der Schmerz
#302
of 374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#375,220
of 439,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Der Schmerz
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 374 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.