You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nurses’, midwives’ and key stakeholders’ experiences and perceptions of a scope of nursing and midwifery practice framework
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Advanced Nursing, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jan.12603 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary Casey, Gerard Fealy, Catriona Kennedy, Josephine Hegarty, Geraldine Prizeman, Martin McNamara, Pauline O'Reilly, Anne‐Marie Brady, Daniela Rohde |
| Abstract |
This paper reports on the qualitative findings from a national review of a nursing and midwifery scope of practice framework. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Timor-Leste | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 42% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 27 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2015.
All research outputs
#4,163,707
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#1,716
of 5,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,947
of 362,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#26
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.