↓ Skip to main content

Orexin A Inhibits Propofol-Induced Neurite Retraction by a Phospholipase D/Protein Kinase Cε-Dependent Mechanism in Neurons

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Orexin A Inhibits Propofol-Induced Neurite Retraction by a Phospholipase D/Protein Kinase Cε-Dependent Mechanism in Neurons
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0097129
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karin Björnström, Dean Turina, Tobias Strid, Tommy Sundqvist, Christina Eintrei

Abstract

The intravenous anaesthetic propofol retracts neurites and reverses the transport of vesicles in rat cortical neurons. Orexin A (OA) is an endogenous neuropeptide regulating wakefulness and may counterbalance anaesthesia. We aim to investigate if OA interacts with anaesthetics by inhibition of the propofol-induced neurite retraction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 33%
Student > Master 3 17%
Researcher 3 17%
Librarian 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 22%
Neuroscience 3 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,248,338
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#173,468
of 194,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,979
of 227,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#4,020
of 4,670 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,670 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.