↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of an electronic tool for medication reconciliation in a general surgery department

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of an electronic tool for medication reconciliation in a general surgery department
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11096-014-0057-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Álvaro Giménez-Manzorro, Rosa María Romero-Jiménez, Miguel Ángel Calleja-Hernández, Rosa Pla-Mestre, Alberto Muñoz-Calero, María Sanjurjo-Sáez

Abstract

Background Medication reconciliation is a key tool in the prevention of adverse drug events. Objective To assess the impact of an electronic reconciliation tool in decreasing unintended discrepancies between medications prescribed after surgery and the patient's usual treatment. Setting General Surgery Department of Gregorio Marañón's University General Hospital, Madrid. Method A pre-post intervention study with no equivalent control group was carried out between June 2009 and December 2010. Patients hospitalized in the General Surgery Department for 24 h or more, and whose prescriptions prior to admission included three or more drugs were included in the study. Patients were interviewed to gather information about their usual treatment drugs. Discrepancies between the latter and the drugs prescribed after surgery were assessed before and after the medication reconciliation electronic tool was implemented. Main outcome measure Proportion of patients with at least one unintended discrepancy. Results A total of 107 patients in the pre-intervention phase and 84 patients in the post-intervention phase were included. We detected 1,678 discrepancies, 167 were found to be unintended. The number of patients with at least one unintended discrepancy was 43 (40.2 %) in the pre-intervention phase, and 38 (38.1 %) in the post-intervention phase, p = 0.885. The percentage of unintended discrepancies over the total amount of drugs reconciled was lower in the post-intervention phase than in the pre-intervention phase (6.6 vs. 10.6 %), p = 0.002. Regarding unintended discrepancies 79.2 % were grade C severity (the error reached the patient but caused no harm), 13.6 % grade D (the error reached the patient and required monitoring or intervention to preclude harm) and 7.1 % grade E (the error may have contributed to or resulted in temporary harm to the patient and required intervention). Conclusion Implementation of an electronic tool facilitated the process of medication reconciliation in a general surgery unit. The proportion of unintended discrepancies over the total amount of drugs reconciled was reduced after the implementation of the reconciliation programme. However, we could not demonstrate a more significant impact due to some methodological limitations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Computer Science 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,248,338
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#1,010
of 1,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,855
of 353,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#16
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.