↓ Skip to main content

Which symptoms matter? Self-report and observer discrepancies in repressors and high-anxious women with metastatic breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Behavioral Medicine, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Which symptoms matter? Self-report and observer discrepancies in repressors and high-anxious women with metastatic breast cancer
Published in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10865-012-9461-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janine Giese-Davis, Rie Tamagawa, Maya Yutsis, Suzanne Twirbutt, Karen Piemme, Eric Neri, C. Barr Taylor, David Spiegel

Abstract

Clinicians working with cancer patients listen to them, observe their behavior, and monitor their physiology. How do we proceed when these indicators do not align? Under self-relevant stress, non-cancer repressors respond with high arousal but report low anxiety; the high-anxious report high anxiety but often have lower arousal. This study extends discrepancy research on repressors and the high-anxious to a metastatic breast cancer sample and examines physician rating of coping. Before and during a Trier Social Stress Test (TSST), we assessed affect, autonomic reactivity, and observers coded emotional expression from TSST videotapes. We compared non-extreme (N = 40), low-anxious (N = 16), high-anxious (N = 19), and repressors (N = 19). Despite reported low anxiety, repressors expressed significantly greater Tension or anxiety cues. Despite reported high anxiety, the high-anxious expressed significantly greater Hostile Affect rather than Tension. Physicians rated both groups as coping significantly better than others. Future research might productively study physician-patient interaction in these groups.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Researcher 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 22 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 14%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Computer Science 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 24 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2015.
All research outputs
#6,945,971
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#455
of 1,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,874
of 176,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.