You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Projecting Global Biodiversity Indicators under Future Development Scenarios
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.12159 |
| Authors |
Piero Visconti, Michel Bakkenes, Daniele Baisero, Thomas Brooks, Stuart H. M. Butchart, Lucas Joppa, Rob Alkemade, Moreno Di Marco, Luca Santini, Michael Hoffmann, Luigi Maiorano, Robert L. Pressey, Anni Arponen, Luigi Boitani, April E. Reside, Detlef P. van Vuuren, Carlo Rondinini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 12% |
| Canada | 7 | 8% |
| Australia | 4 | 5% |
| Finland | 4 | 5% |
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 36 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 54 | 65% |
| Scientists | 27 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 652 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 5 | <1% |
| Brazil | 5 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 622 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 147 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 106 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 100 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 57 | 9% |
| Other | 37 | 6% |
| Other | 85 | 13% |
| Unknown | 120 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 228 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 190 | 29% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 25 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 43 | 7% |
| Unknown | 149 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2022.
All research outputs
#662,370
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#238
of 1,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,948
of 272,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.