↓ Skip to main content

Peer review and over-competitive research funding fostering mainstream opinion to monopoly

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Peer review and over-competitive research funding fostering mainstream opinion to monopoly
Published in
Scientometrics, November 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11192-010-0323-4
Authors

Hui Fang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 3%
Belgium 1 3%
South Africa 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 32 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Professor 4 11%
Librarian 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 10 28%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 31%
Computer Science 6 17%
Engineering 4 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,783,090
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#1,186
of 2,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,194
of 180,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.