↓ Skip to main content

Comparing and contrasting threat assessments of plant species at the global and sub-global level

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Comparing and contrasting threat assessments of plant species at the global and sub-global level
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10531-017-1472-z
Authors

Ross Mounce, Malin Rivers, Suzanne Sharrock, Paul Smith, Samuel Brockington

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Other 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 50%
Environmental Science 9 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Unspecified 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2021.
All research outputs
#13,428,001
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,632
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,077
of 445,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#23
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.