↓ Skip to main content

Many worlds: decoherent or incoherent?

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Many worlds: decoherent or incoherent?
Published in
Synthese, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11229-014-0650-8
Authors

Richard Dawid, Karim P. Y. Thébault

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 7 37%
Physics and Astronomy 4 21%
Mathematics 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,248,338
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#2,289
of 2,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,328
of 352,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#35
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.