↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations of the Global Multiple System Atrophy Research Roadmap Meeting

Overview of attention for article published in Neurology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recommendations of the Global Multiple System Atrophy Research Roadmap Meeting
Published in
Neurology, December 2017
DOI 10.1212/wnl.0000000000004798
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan R. Walsh, Florian Krismer, Wendy R. Galpern, Gregor K. Wenning, Phillip A. Low, Glenda Halliday, Walter J. Koroshetz, Janice Holton, Niall P. Quinn, Olivier Rascol, Leslie M. Shaw, David Eidelberg, Pam Bower, Jeffrey L. Cummings, Victor Abler, Judy Biedenharn, Gal Bitan, David J. Brooks, Patrik Brundin, Hubert Fernandez, Philip Fortier, Roy Freeman, Thomas Gasser, Art Hewitt, Günter U. Höglinger, Matt J. Huentelman, Poul H. Jensen, Andreas Jeromin, Un Jung Kang, Horacio Kaufmann, Lawrence Kellerman, Vikram Khurana, Thomas Klockgether, Woojin Scott Kim, Carol Langer, Peter LeWitt, Eliezer Masliah, Wassilios Meissner, Ronald Melki, Susanne Ostrowitzki, Steven Piantadosi, Werner Poewe, David Robertson, Cyndi Roemer, Dale Schenk, Michael Schlossmacher, Jeremy D. Schmahmann, Klaus Seppi, Lily Shih, Andrew Siderowf, Glenn T. Stebbins, Nadia Stefanova, Shoji Tsuji, Sharon Sutton, Jing Zhang

Abstract

Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is a rare neurodegenerative disorder with substantial knowledge gaps despite recent gains in basic and clinical research. In order to make further advances, concerted international collaboration is vital. In 2014, an international meeting involving leaders in the field and MSA advocacy groups was convened in Las Vegas, Nevada, to identify critical research areas where consensus and progress was needed to improve understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of the disease. Eight topic areas were defined: pathogenesis, preclinical modeling, target identification, endophenotyping, clinical measures, imaging biomarkers, nonimaging biomarkers, treatments/trial designs, and patient advocacy. For each topic area, an expert served as a working group chair and each working group developed priority-ranked research recommendations with associated timelines and pathways to reach the intended goals. In this report, each groups' recommendations are provided.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 12%
Professor 9 12%
Other 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 19 26%
Unknown 16 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 23%
Neuroscience 15 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 22 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2019.
All research outputs
#4,004,097
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from Neurology
#6,839
of 20,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,083
of 439,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology
#78
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.