↓ Skip to main content

Congenital portosystemic venous shunt

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
Title
Congenital portosystemic venous shunt
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00431-017-3058-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Papamichail, M. Pizanias, N. Heaton

Abstract

Congenital portosystemic venous shunts are rare developmental anomalies resulting in diversion of portal flow to the systemic circulation and have been divided into extra- and intrahepatic shunts. They occur during liver and systemic venous vascular embryogenesis and are associated with other congenital abnormalities. They carry a higher risk of benign and malignant liver tumors and, if left untreated, can result in significant medical complications including systemic encephalopathy and pulmonary hypertension. This article reviews the various types of congenital portosystemic shunts and their anatomy, pathogenesis, symptomatology, and timing and options of treatment. What is Known: • The natural history and basic management of this rare congenital anomaly are presented. What is New: • This paper is a comprehensive review; highlights important topics in pathogenesis, clinical symptomatology, and treatment options; and proposes an algorithm in the management of congenital portosystemic shunt disease in order to provide a clear idea to a pediatrician. An effort has been made to emphasize the indications for treatment in the children population and link to the adult group by discussing the consequences of lack of treatment or delayed diagnosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 129 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 19 15%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Master 8 6%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 42 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 49%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 46 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,932,967
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#751
of 3,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,209
of 439,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#13
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.