↓ Skip to main content

The second European evidence-based Consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease: Special situations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Crohn's and Colitis Supplements, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
patent
15 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
683 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
591 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The second European evidence-based Consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease: Special situations
Published in
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis Supplements, December 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.crohns.2009.09.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gert Van Assche, Axel Dignass, Walter Reinisch, C. Janneke van der Woude, Andreas Sturm, Martine De Vos, Mario Guslandi, Bas Oldenburg, Iris Dotan, Philippe Marteau, Alessandro Ardizzone, Daniel C. Baumgart, Geert D'Haens, Paolo Gionchetti, Francisco Portela, Boris Vucelic, Johan Söderholm, Johanna Escher, Sibylle Koletzko, Kaija-Leena Kolho, Milan Lukas, Christian Mottet, Herbert Tilg, Séverine Vermeire, Frank Carbonnel, Andrew Cole, Gottfried Novacek, Max Reinshagen, Epameinondas Tsianos, Klaus Herrlinger, Bas Oldenburg, Yoram Bouhnik, Ralf Kiesslich, Eduard Stange, Simon Travis, James Lindsay, for the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 591 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 1%
Spain 5 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 562 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 101 17%
Other 80 14%
Student > Master 65 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 11%
Student > Bachelor 55 9%
Other 157 27%
Unknown 70 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 378 64%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 3%
Psychology 9 2%
Other 48 8%
Unknown 87 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,869,356
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Crohn's and Colitis Supplements
#216
of 2,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,169
of 173,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Crohn's and Colitis Supplements
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.