| Title |
Are Social Networks Survival Networks? An Example from the Late Pre-Hispanic US Southwest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10816-014-9236-5 |
| Authors |
Lewis Borck, Barbara J. Mills, Matthew A. Peeples, Jeffery J. Clark |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 34% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 47 | 39% |
| Arts and Humanities | 34 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,036,872
of 24,601,689 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#26
of 347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,931
of 362,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,601,689 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.