↓ Skip to main content

Immune cells and immune-based therapy in pancreatitis

Overview of attention for article published in Immunologic Research, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Immune cells and immune-based therapy in pancreatitis
Published in
Immunologic Research, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12026-014-8504-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Xue, Vishal Sharma, Aida Habtezion

Abstract

Alcohol and gallstones are the most common etiologic factors in acute pancreatitis (AP). Recurrent AP can lead to chronic pancreatitis (CP). Although the underlying pathophysiology of the disease is complex, immune cells are critical in the pathogenesis of pancreatitis and determining disease severity. In this review, we discuss the role of innate and adaptive immune cells in both AP and CP, potential immune-based therapeutic targets, and animal models used to understand our knowledge of the disease. The relative difficulty of obtaining human pancreatic tissue during pancreatitis makes animal models necessary. Animal models of pancreatitis have been generated to understand disease pathogenesis, test therapeutic interventions, and investigate immune responses. Although current animal models do not recapitulate all aspects of human disease, until better models can be developed available models are useful in addressing key research questions. Differences between experimental and clinical pancreatitis need consideration, and when therapies are tested, models with established disease ought to be included.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,248,338
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Immunologic Research
#756
of 903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,000
of 228,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunologic Research
#31
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.