↓ Skip to main content

The reliability and validity of the Q‐angle: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The reliability and validity of the Q‐angle: a systematic review
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00167-008-0643-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toby O. Smith, Nathan J. Hunt, Simon T. Donell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 1%
Italy 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 288 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 64 21%
Student > Master 46 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 8%
Researcher 20 7%
Student > Postgraduate 20 7%
Other 55 18%
Unknown 69 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 31%
Sports and Recreations 68 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Engineering 7 2%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 77 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2015.
All research outputs
#17,363,471
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#2,038
of 3,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,159
of 106,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,006 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.